![]() ![]() Then, one can rate the images, add keywords, set color labels, and so on. This moment is a good one to add photos to a Project. Instead, one uses the browser screen to drag and drop the files from your memory card into the Folders browser. For those who prefer to browse, there is a Folders browser too. In Lightroom, I have always used Collections, and PhotoLab 6 has a similar function called “Projects.” It is a quick and easy way of sorting and finding photos. When I did, I could see that it was a powerful tool. It took me a little while to get used to the PhotoLibrary. It's the image quality of the program's raw engine that is where its big advantage stands. However, recently, I compared the raw results from different cameras through various software packages, and PhotoLab 6 blew my socks off.ĭxO PhotoLab is primarily a raw developer, with browser and catalog functions. Nevertheless, I am rarely persuaded to change my workflow. Many different cameras and a wide range of software pass through my hands. What I Like About DxO PhotoLab 6.3 and What Can Be Improved.The Wide Gamut Color Space in PhotoLab 6 Elite.Sharpening, Removing Noise, and Local Adjustments.Not a pixel editor or a do it all but what it does does it good. So yes, about the steep second pricetag, i had the same feeling when i bought v1.2 elite suite and must do a full update price after 5months but in the end DxOPL is evolved in a great powerfull rawdeveloper. It’s renovation work in the buildingstructure so to speak.Īnd as anyone who did renovation work in houses most of your time and money goes in not visible things. Preformensspeed (also a complain of some), xtrans, DAM, and some fine tuning ,expansion of excisting toolset. Most updatework is done “under the hood” not immidiate visible. Xtrans support was long ask feature request and if you understand how deepprime and prime and optical module works on a raw file then you understand the impact on the algorithm to squeeze in xtranssensors. Stil it’s a good thing they did spent recources to implement. It’s almost layermasking based on chroma, color, or luminosity, brightnes.Įxport of keywords and such in xmp, yes good but that’s can also be handled by other apps. Once you learn to use locals in it’s full capacity you understand the importancy of selectivity improvement in upoint masking. You could skip this update and jump to v6.īut i would say the luminosity and chroma slider in local adjustment alone is the update wordy. ![]() Which means that next year you pay normal fee.īut then again stepping on the train is alway’s the first year extra expensive.Įveryone knows there is a upgrade/update every year around october and 2 or 3 free fixes and minor updates along the year of the same version. 1 month before upgrade is 12/12 back 3 months before upgrade is 12-3 is 9/12 discount. ![]() What would be fair though is a reversed expiration. Then the purchase just becomes 2x as expensive. This one is not for me.ġ2 months is the recicle time for renewal so then any 1st version update is free. I will cross fingers for dxo and still waiting for new features in next versions. Im running on third version of Photolab and in my opinion, now with this changes it does not worth the extra money, that I must pay for the update to v5. Many of major feature was relased in 1.5 and 2.0 versions(u points, color profiles, lens corrections, smart lighting, clearview…) Succesors offers a Little bit more feautures that was minor. Still miss simple radial filter - now if we set chrome and luma to value 0, correction becomes a circle. Still miss local HSL corrections with own masks. ![]() New tool in local corrections, and adding aditional sliders for chrome and luma its just ok, but still miss corrections via luminosity or color range. And its ok.įor me personaly, this update changes almost nothing. For those users is game changer as was 3,4 years for others. Company wants sell the product to wider group of users - in this version adds Fuji xtrans support. As always its seems to minor improvements. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |